Contents
  1. §Two gating decisions
  2. §The batches — 13 bets
  3. §The scoreboard

Working sheet

Next steps — contacts and first bets

Working sheet, August 2026  ·  Not for sharing outside the group

Two decisions that gate everything else

Every contact below was verified against the organisation’s own pages on 24 Aug 2026 unless marked ⚠. Each entry is a bet: what it costs (mostly an email), what it tells us, and an honest read on the odds it pays off.

  1. LTA money vs equity money — structural fork. The loan scheme (Route E) only funds not-for-profit structures; Crowdcube, and only work for a company limited by shares. We cannot keep both doors open past incorporation. Decide before applying for anything.
  2. before EIS. ’s looks hard at ventures; a -owning company is a likely refusal, a trading operator leasing its premises is the standard pass. South East Angels requires an EIS-qualifying round, so this ordering is critical path for the whole equity side.

The batches — thirteen first bets

Batch 1 hits the four biggest unknowns — finance terms, building availability, status, real — for the price of about seven emails. Everything in Batch 2 either needs those answers or spends real money; Batch 3 needs the earlier dominoes down.

Batch 1 — send this week (cost: five emails, one browser check).

1. Mill Wood Finance — padel asset finance, and it’s local ★ best first call

  • Henry Bolland (named padel contact) · 01273 523690 · millwoodfinance.com/padel-court-finance · Rustington, West Sussex
  • The only broker that publishes its first-pack list: business plan + cashflow forecast, evidence of own capital, management/padel experience (preferred), security (assets or PGs), repayment from court cashflow. Send the financial overview section and ask two questions: would you fund a new-start on this plan, and at what terms/deposit?
  • Read: high likelihood of a substantive answer. Local, padel-specialist, sales-motivated. Their answer is the fastest feasibility test of Route A that exists.

2. Flude — the industrial agent with the best published contact

  • Andrew Halfacree, Director, Industrial Agency · 01273 740385 · a.halfacree@flude.com (plus Tom Woodward, 01273 740384)
  • Brief: 13,000–20,000 sq ft, 6m+ height over a courts zone (apex counts, not just — pitched roofs are fine), A23/A27 corridor, leasehold, long lease available. Ask what’s on and what’s coming.
  • Read: high. Flude’s own director talked up padel demand in the press on the Shoreham scheme — they know the sector wants sheds. Send the same brief to James Bryant at Graves Son & Pilcher (jb@gsp.uk.com, 01273 321123) and SHW Brighton (brighton@shw.co.uk FAO the Industrial & Logistics team, 01273 876200). Three agents = the real availability picture in a week.
  • Ask about these specific live listings (found Aug 2026): Unit 24 Panattoni Park Burgess Hill (15,818 sq ft, 8m eaves — closest spec match; SHW/Vail Williams); 59 Victoria Road Burgess Hill (29,829 sq ft, 10m — oversized, subdivision?); Unit 2 York Road Burgess Hill (20,000 sq ft, £9.75/sq ft — GS&P, height unstated); Units 3&5 Lancing Business Park (6.7m high-bay, £10/sq ft — GS&P); Units 3&4 School Close Burgess Hill (£6.75/sq ft, already has consent — Flude’s own listing; height doubtful, view anyway); Unit 3 Ellen Street Portslade (13,011 sq ft, 6.5m — SHW Crawley). Also: Panattoni offers design-and-build at Burgess Hill, and Buckingham Park Lewes takes pre-lets from June 2026 (Oakley: Steven Harvey, steven@oakleyproperty.com, 01273 645772).
  • Competitive intel — ✅ RESOLVED 24 Aug 2026 (checked on the planning register): the April press story was the Consort Way scheme, and it is approved (DM/26/0781, permission 14 May 2026): four indoor courts plus a café and social space at Victoria Business Park, applicant Sally Vans Agnew (local family, Capital Hair & Beauty; likely vehicle Foundry Investment Capital Ltd — its SIC codes include “operation of sports facilities”). A discharge-of-conditions application went in 11 Aug 2026, so is imminent. No second Burgess Hill scheme exists. Also approved: 3 more outdoor courts at Eixo (Jan 2026) and Plumpton Racecourse’s 5-court centre (Aug 2026); one refusal at St Francis Sports & Social Club, Haywards Heath. Business case §3/§4/§10 updated accordingly — mention the Consort Way opening when talking to agents about Burgess Hill units.

3. British Business Bank — South East Investment Fund — ✅ CHECKED 24 AUG 2026, nothing to do yet

  • Status: not launched. The page still says “coming soon / summer 2026” (unchanged since March); no fund managers appointed for any product line; no borrower application or expression-of-interest route exists; SMEs can apply only “as soon as the funds launch”. Facts: £350m across the SE + East of England funds; loans £25k–£2m; equity up to £5m.
  • No human action. Claude monitors for the launch/manager announcement; the moment managers are named, the Route B1 conversation opens with a named counterparty. (Optional 30-second human task only if wanted: join the BBB Nations & Regions newsletter with your own email.)

4. Tennis Sussex — local intel, hiding in plain sight

  • Nicola Barnes (venue liaison) · nicola.barnes@tennissussex.com · office: 07398 145446 — and their office is physically inside The Padel Hub, Haywards Heath (Unit 4 Link 23, RH17 5JS), i.e. the big warehouse venue we already play at.
  • Ask for a conversation about padel demand in Sussex, the venue registration route, and who else is circling which sites. County bodies know the planning pipeline gossip before it’s public.
  • Read: high, and cheap. Worst case, a friendly coffee at a venue we were going to anyway.

5. Court suppliers — feasibility conversations

  • Padel Tech (built Padium; 150+ UK installs): info@padeltech.co.uk · 0131 581 8683. Their form asks planning status / funding status / canopy / court count — have answers ready. Hexa Padel (East Grinstead number — closest): sales@hexapadel.co.uk · 01342 894508.
  • Ask both: indicative cost for 4 doubles + 2 singles indoor, and whether they’ll do a site feasibility visit once we have a shortlist (neither advertises free visits — ask).
  • Read: high response likelihood (they sell courts), medium information value until we have a building — but their number for our spec tightens the capex table, and installers see every building problem before we do.

The scoreboard

#BetCostWhat it tells usOdds of useful signal
1Mill Wood FinanceemailIs Route A’s layer real, at what termsHigh
2Flude + GS&P + SHW3 emailsDoes a building existHigh
3SEIF page check5 minutesIs Route B1 open yet, and via whomCertain
4Tennis Sussexemail/coffeeLocal pipeline intel, registration routeHigh
5Padel Tech + Hexa2 emailsReal capex for our specHigh
6Start Up Loans4 applications£100k of the stack, yes/noHigh
7EIS advance assurance£499 + VATWhether the equity side works at allGood
8South East AngelsformFirst £50–150k of equity interestMedium
9Sussex Innovation£50/monthNetwork + second angel poolMedium
10Council pre-app£582–£1,586Official planning signal on a real buildingHigh (when timed right)
11Crowdcubefees on successThe £250–350k closerGood, but sequenced last
12LTA loanformRoute E’s terms, if we fork that wayHigh, gated on structure

Batch 1 hits the four biggest unknowns — finance terms, building availability, SEIF status, real capex — for the price of about seven emails. Everything in Batch 2 either needs those answers or spends real money.

Working sheet · August 2026 · Not for sharing outside the group · Unfamiliar terms? Glossary →